shehiya or hachazara? (Shabbos 36b-37a)
The gemara seems to try to force a pshat into the Mishna to explain that it's really talking about hachazara and not shehiya. Tosafos (d"h l'olam) is bothered why the gemara goes through such trouble to come up with this pshat in the Mishna. He suggests that it does it because we paken like Chananya that shehiya is allowed as long as it's k'maachal ben drusai even without giruf or kitum. So the gemara wanted to fit the Mishna in with that shita. So according to Tosafos that's why we added words to the Mishna and we explained the Mishna that we were first talking about hachazara then switched to shehiya and then back to hachazara.
The Mishna could fit in with Chananya even if you say it's talking about shehiya - it's talking about leaving something that is less than 1/3rd cooked on the fire when Shabbos starts. Then you don't have to change the whole mishna so to talk about hachazara but it still fits in with Chananya. So why, sccording to Tosafos, didn't the gemara do that?
posted by David @ 10:08 PM
2 Comments:
After thinking about it more, I realized that if the reisha of the Mishna was just talking shehiya of food that was not cooked k'maachal ben drusai then it would have had to at some point told the regular halacha of shehiya. It would be dochek to say that the Mishna just went to hachazara without explaining the regular din of shehiya (then again the pshat we end up with is pretty docheck too).
growthis an important element of achieving
success and being happy. Not everyone who has evolved has
achieved success, [b]but everyone who has achieved success
[url=https://coachszkolenia.wordpress.com/]coaching[/url] has
developed and done a lot of work on themselves. [/b]
Personal development is on the one hand my way of life,
but also my passion and idea for living life.
Post a Comment
<< Home